D
motu 2 - my 1st loveа
Заказал в Москву 13 января в ночь на 14е, 19го утром уже получил посылочку с гитарой(ups express). Сразу коротко и ясно отзыв об
этой великолепной карте:
-Сборка высшего качества, крутилки, разъемы - все безупречно.
-Удобство установки - все ок на мак(ос монтерей)
- Звук СУПЕР(всё громко и чётко). Гитару пишет превосходно, звук шикарен, просто идеал.
-соотношение цена/качество прекрасное
Спасибо Thomann !
Я счастлив
этой великолепной карте:
-Сборка высшего качества, крутилки, разъемы - все безупречно.
-Удобство установки - все ок на мак(ос монтерей)
- Звук СУПЕР(всё громко и чётко). Гитару пишет превосходно, звук шикарен, просто идеал.
-соотношение цена/качество прекрасное
Спасибо Thomann !
Я счастлив
16
10
Report
UL
Oozing quality & finesse… Sabre32 bliss! 🦋
I’ve always loved MOTU (obviously nothing to do with the fact that I also love Unicorns)I :P but seriously I can remember seeing their beautiful hardware back in the 80’s as a child!
Quality, reliability and thoughtful design and aesthetics is always paramount to me being an unashamed/self confessed design/tech fiend! I’ve had so many inexpensive get by, 2/4 channel, small form factor sound cards I’ve lost count (PreSonus, Native Instruments, Steinberg et al)… all lack lustre and highly forgettable when it came to sound quality, latency, performance and driver stability.
I always promised myself something better, but as my I/O needs are kinda basic being primarily a software musician (I don’t need Dante, ADAT, 32 Channels, AVB et al); just something small that I can use with both my iPad Pro M5 and my PC workstation to create.
Having researched this need, there was only one realistic choice being the MOTU M2. Why? I want the best hardware/price ratio there is without paying for extra features I don’t need. I want industry respected drivers from a company with a lineage that goes back to 84’. I respect high design and quality manufacturing and attention to detail (which is why I usually gravitate to German made design/production).
Having researched the MOTU M2 there seemed like nothing comparable out there. The closest (RME, SSL, UAD+ cost £600/700) by comparison as they enforce broader features. Thus, I finally caved and OMG… I’m so glad I did! Just taking this beauty out of the box, you can instantly see/feel the thought and care that has gone into the design of this beauty!
The manufacturing is just gorgeous, the chassis a beautiful textured solid metal (even metal potentiometers too). Everything is machined to high tolerances so it fits perfectly along with soft, smooth edges galore. Even tiny anodised hex fittings instead of cheap screws. Beautifully formed uniquely shaped, contoured rubber feet gracefully provide solid traction and protect the underlying surface.
All inputs I/O are perfectly seated within the chassis to prevent movement (often not the case on lesser hardware which consequently can result in crackling with typically being connected directly to the PCB) …just not here!
A beautiful high definition super bright and clear OLED display with high resolution meters (not a few cheap LED’s that tell you nothing) as is the case with lesser hardware products. A really appealing, gorgeous blue illuminated monitoring GUI looks TRON’esq!
I’m already smitten, as the M2 really is a thing of beauty (and I haven't even plugged it in yet)! A short 90 CM USB A to C lead is provided, the driver installation is quick and painless. So… how does it perform, does high quality drivers and hardware features (like Sabre32) actually make a difference? Yes it really does, latency was instantly ‘massively’ reduced and running at a higher clock rate (48 instead of 44.1 Khz).
So what does it sound like then? Again the difference is not subtle, but hard to quantify also as its into the domain of psychoacoustics. Because the hardware produces such clean, pure (ultra low harmonic distortion) sound, its somewhat sublime (and deceiving in terms of the impression of loudness) as often sonic ‘impurities’ appear louder, more obviously. As such, I instinctively wanted to crank it; only to realise it was pretty darn loud (but lush too)!
The MOTU M2 has an incredibly pure and rich lush sound, and the onboard headphone AMP sounds incredible (plenty of gain) my AKG’s discovered a new sonic territory of precision. Its so easy to think that ‘passable’ is ok (until you hear the difference of quality/precision)!
I’ve not had chance to check out the Mic Pre’s yet with my Sennheiser or AKG microphones but naturally I can’t wait and I’m sure that the Amphenol driven I/O sounds utterly delicious!
To surmise, I’m basically completely impressed by how good the MOTU M2 really is and regret not upgrading to it back in 2019 when it was released. For me it’s an ideal choice as it offers the best quality and performance I can get without buying features I simply don’t need. I actually considered the MOTU 828 for my future studio expansion plans (more hardware and post production orientated), so it seemed like a logical step to remind myself why MOTU rocks! Incredible device, and basically smitten!
Quality, reliability and thoughtful design and aesthetics is always paramount to me being an unashamed/self confessed design/tech fiend! I’ve had so many inexpensive get by, 2/4 channel, small form factor sound cards I’ve lost count (PreSonus, Native Instruments, Steinberg et al)… all lack lustre and highly forgettable when it came to sound quality, latency, performance and driver stability.
I always promised myself something better, but as my I/O needs are kinda basic being primarily a software musician (I don’t need Dante, ADAT, 32 Channels, AVB et al); just something small that I can use with both my iPad Pro M5 and my PC workstation to create.
Having researched this need, there was only one realistic choice being the MOTU M2. Why? I want the best hardware/price ratio there is without paying for extra features I don’t need. I want industry respected drivers from a company with a lineage that goes back to 84’. I respect high design and quality manufacturing and attention to detail (which is why I usually gravitate to German made design/production).
Having researched the MOTU M2 there seemed like nothing comparable out there. The closest (RME, SSL, UAD+ cost £600/700) by comparison as they enforce broader features. Thus, I finally caved and OMG… I’m so glad I did! Just taking this beauty out of the box, you can instantly see/feel the thought and care that has gone into the design of this beauty!
The manufacturing is just gorgeous, the chassis a beautiful textured solid metal (even metal potentiometers too). Everything is machined to high tolerances so it fits perfectly along with soft, smooth edges galore. Even tiny anodised hex fittings instead of cheap screws. Beautifully formed uniquely shaped, contoured rubber feet gracefully provide solid traction and protect the underlying surface.
All inputs I/O are perfectly seated within the chassis to prevent movement (often not the case on lesser hardware which consequently can result in crackling with typically being connected directly to the PCB) …just not here!
A beautiful high definition super bright and clear OLED display with high resolution meters (not a few cheap LED’s that tell you nothing) as is the case with lesser hardware products. A really appealing, gorgeous blue illuminated monitoring GUI looks TRON’esq!
I’m already smitten, as the M2 really is a thing of beauty (and I haven't even plugged it in yet)! A short 90 CM USB A to C lead is provided, the driver installation is quick and painless. So… how does it perform, does high quality drivers and hardware features (like Sabre32) actually make a difference? Yes it really does, latency was instantly ‘massively’ reduced and running at a higher clock rate (48 instead of 44.1 Khz).
So what does it sound like then? Again the difference is not subtle, but hard to quantify also as its into the domain of psychoacoustics. Because the hardware produces such clean, pure (ultra low harmonic distortion) sound, its somewhat sublime (and deceiving in terms of the impression of loudness) as often sonic ‘impurities’ appear louder, more obviously. As such, I instinctively wanted to crank it; only to realise it was pretty darn loud (but lush too)!
The MOTU M2 has an incredibly pure and rich lush sound, and the onboard headphone AMP sounds incredible (plenty of gain) my AKG’s discovered a new sonic territory of precision. Its so easy to think that ‘passable’ is ok (until you hear the difference of quality/precision)!
I’ve not had chance to check out the Mic Pre’s yet with my Sennheiser or AKG microphones but naturally I can’t wait and I’m sure that the Amphenol driven I/O sounds utterly delicious!
To surmise, I’m basically completely impressed by how good the MOTU M2 really is and regret not upgrading to it back in 2019 when it was released. For me it’s an ideal choice as it offers the best quality and performance I can get without buying features I simply don’t need. I actually considered the MOTU 828 for my future studio expansion plans (more hardware and post production orientated), so it seemed like a logical step to remind myself why MOTU rocks! Incredible device, and basically smitten!
2
0
Report
O
Powerful yet portable
First time using this portable Motu interface and I'm pleasantly surprised. I used to own the MK3 years ago and the quality was outstanding. The M2 is very similar in quality. I listened to some of my recordings with my previous audio interface and they sounded appalling! Once I re-recorded the instruments using the M2, the quality was significantly better. I would definitely recommend this device to anyone who wants to put together a small-scale home studio.
3
0
Report
IB
Fantanstic quality and usability
I've spent quite some time researching the market for the best balanced audio interface for my needs - record voice and electric guitar.
The best review I've seen is from Julian Krausse on YouTube, really deep technical analysis and comparison, watch it!
Now Motu M2 may cost above average for this user level devices, but I think it's worth it. It's just amazingly perfect in all aspects, but I'd mention 2 things:
- do upgrade firmware, I did have occasional weird noise in monitoring channels, and upgrade solved it
- power is just enough to drive Sony MDR-7506, maybe it will not be enough for some monitors with higher input impedance, but probably it's still better than other interfaces
The best review I've seen is from Julian Krausse on YouTube, really deep technical analysis and comparison, watch it!
Now Motu M2 may cost above average for this user level devices, but I think it's worth it. It's just amazingly perfect in all aspects, but I'd mention 2 things:
- do upgrade firmware, I did have occasional weird noise in monitoring channels, and upgrade solved it
- power is just enough to drive Sony MDR-7506, maybe it will not be enough for some monitors with higher input impedance, but probably it's still better than other interfaces
0
0
Report
T
Really Big Upgrade
I purchased this to replace my Focusrite Solo 3rd Gen interface because it was unreliable. My microphone was always crackling, when I was listening to audio it made random noises and it was really annoying. Motu M2 is a huge upgrade for me, couldn't be more satisfied with the purchase. The small screen on the interface looks really nice, sounds a lot clearer than my old interface and also it's a lot more reliable, build quality feels a lot better as well. I can only recommend it to anyone who's considering this buy!
3
0
Report
d
Definitely worth extra price
I love MOTU M2, build quality is amazing, the thing feels solid. But what is more important - the drivers are great. It works great both on Windows and Mac. It even works with iPad and Ubuntu Studio without any issues. Built-in screen and gain meter is straightforward and convenient.
0
0
Report
A
Excellent Interface - best at this price
I got this about a month ago and it has been stellar. Previously, I was using a Roland Rubix 22.
The Motu M2 has been reviewed in considerable depth already, so there isn't anything new I can say about it. From my personal perspective it has been excellent and I highly recommend it to anyone on a budget.
PROS:
- Best at this price range in multiple categories: balance, headphone amp (internal impedance and output power), distortion, noise, frequency response
- Can drive my 470 ohm headphones
- Solid build quality (body feels robust, knobs are smooth and have adequate weight when turning them)
- macOS driver and software shaved off additional seconds from the overall delay time in my DAW - REMEMBER to install them if you are a mac user
- Loopback functionality
- Display is not necessary but cool to have and accurate as well
- On/Off button
CONS:
- Included USB cable is dangerously close to being too short
The Motu M2 has been reviewed in considerable depth already, so there isn't anything new I can say about it. From my personal perspective it has been excellent and I highly recommend it to anyone on a budget.
PROS:
- Best at this price range in multiple categories: balance, headphone amp (internal impedance and output power), distortion, noise, frequency response
- Can drive my 470 ohm headphones
- Solid build quality (body feels robust, knobs are smooth and have adequate weight when turning them)
- macOS driver and software shaved off additional seconds from the overall delay time in my DAW - REMEMBER to install them if you are a mac user
- Loopback functionality
- Display is not necessary but cool to have and accurate as well
- On/Off button
CONS:
- Included USB cable is dangerously close to being too short
0
0
Report
C
Motu M2 Review
Great converters and pre amps!
0
0
Report
s
Amazing product
MOTU M2 is a strong value interface with clean, transparent preamps and excellent AD/DA conversion in its price range. It has near-zero latency monitoring, solid build quality, and one of the best-in-class metering systems, making gain staging easy and reliable. The sound is neutral and accurate, which is ideal for mixing and recording without coloration. Overall, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense interface that punches above its price.
0
0
Report
RL
MOTU M2
Top Tier entry level interface. It is very easy to understand and it easy to use and get started.
0
0
Report